Therapy

Normalising psychotic experiences: a core CBTp technique

March 31, 2026 8 min read

One of the first things a good CBT for psychosis therapist does is hand the patient a piece of unexpected information: experiences like yours are more common than you think. Not exactly the same as everyone else's, not necessarily benign, but on a continuum with experiences that ordinary people have throughout their lives. This move is called normalising, and it sits near the heart of the CBTp approach. It is also one of the most misunderstood techniques in the field — both by patients who fear it dismisses what they are going through and by clinicians who confuse it with telling people their symptoms are "fine."

In one sentence

Normalising is the deliberate use of facts about how common psychotic-like experiences are in the general population to reduce the secondary suffering — the sense of being uniquely broken — that psychosis often produces.

Where the technique came from

Normalising was developed within the early CBTp work of David Kingdon and Douglas Turkington in the 1990s, and is described in detail in their textbook Cognitive Therapy of Schizophrenia. Around the same time, the Dutch psychiatrist Marius Romme and his colleague Patsy Hage launched the Hearing Voices movement after Romme realised that a substantial number of people in the general population heard voices and never came near a psychiatric service. Their book Accepting Voices made the case that voice-hearing is part of the human range of experience, not exclusively a sign of illness.

The technique was later embedded in the British NICE CG178 guideline as part of standard CBTp practice and is taught in essentially every CBTp training programme worldwide.

What the data say about commonness

Some illustrative findings:

None of this means that the experiences of someone with schizophrenia are "the same" as those of someone with a brief hypnopompic voice. The intensity, frequency, distress, and behavioural impact are usually very different. But the existence of a continuum is real — and recognising it changes the meaning of one's own experience.

How normalising is delivered in session

The therapist does not lecture. The information is offered tentatively and personalised to what the patient describes:

The aim is not to convince the patient there is nothing wrong. The aim is to remove the additional layer of suffering that comes from believing one's experiences are uniquely alien, monstrous, or evidence of being beyond help.

What normalising is not

Why it works

Several mechanisms have been proposed:

The continuum of psychotic experience

The continuum framing has gone from controversial to mainstream over the past two decades. Researchers including Jim van Os, Richard Bentall, and Ron Kessler have argued that psychosis-spectrum experiences are distributed across the population, with diagnosis representing the more severe and impairing end. This view does not eliminate the diagnostic category — schizophrenia involves a constellation that goes beyond isolated experiences — but it reframes those experiences as variations rather than as a categorical break from normal.

What patients say after normalising

Common reactions, drawn from clinical experience:

Connections to peer support

The Hearing Voices Network, NAMI peer support groups (nami.org), and similar organisations all use normalising as a foundational principle. For many people, the experience of sitting in a room with others who hear voices accomplishes in an hour what individual therapy may take months to do. CBTp and peer support are complementary rather than competing.

For people considering this work

If your clinician has never offered any of this kind of context, it is reasonable to ask. "Are experiences like mine more common than I think?" is a fair question and a good clinician will answer it honestly. The answer often opens the door to the rest of CBTp.


This article is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified mental health professional. If you or someone you know is in crisis, call or text 988 in the US, or your local emergency number.

Frequently asked questions

Does normalising mean my schizophrenia is not real?
No. The diagnosis describes a constellation of experiences that, taken together, cause significant impairment. Normalising places individual experiences (like voices) on a continuum, but it does not deny the reality of the underlying condition.
If voices are common, why do I have schizophrenia and others do not?
Most people who have a brief unusual experience never develop schizophrenia. Schizophrenia involves a particular pattern — multiple symptoms, persistence, distress, functional impairment — that goes beyond isolated unusual experiences. Genetic vulnerability, neurodevelopmental factors, and stressors all play roles.
Is the Hearing Voices Network anti-psychiatry?
Not necessarily. Some members are critical of mainstream psychiatry; others combine HVN involvement with medication and clinical care. The movement itself is a peer support framework, not a treatment system.
Can normalising backfire?
If done carelessly — 'everyone hears voices, you are fine' — it can feel dismissive and damage trust. Done carefully, with personalised facts and acknowledgement of distress, it is one of the most useful techniques in CBTp.

Try Frida — your calm companion

Frida helps people living with schizophrenia track moods, manage medication, and build stability. 7-day free trial.

Get the app →